RESEARCH PAPER INFORMATION GUIDE


TABLE OF CONTENTS:


II.   NOTETAKING

III.  PLAGIARISM

IV.   BIBLIOGRAPHY AND TEXT DOCUMENTATION

V.    RESEARCH PAPER FORMAT
VI.   SAMPLE TEXT WITH DOCUMENTATION:

VII.  GUIDELINES FOR FINDING AND DEVELOPING A THESIS

VIII.GUIDELINES FOR FIXING WEAK THESIS STATEMENTS

IX.   GUIDELINES FOR INTRODUCTIONS AND CONCLUSIONS

X.    GUIDELINES FOR ANALYZING EVIDENCE

XI.   GUIDELINES FOR USING SOURCES


I.   OVERVIEW OF THE PROCESS

A. Browse print materials such as magazine articles and newspaper articles. Surf web sites. Get ideas for a topic that fits into the guidelines set by your teacher.

B. Do some freewriting on topics that interest you.

C. When you come across a topic that you feel strongly about, narrow it down to one that can be handled in the length of the paper that your teacher assigned.

D. Compose a tentative thesis that contains an arguable point and is focused on one specific aspect of your topic.

E. Do some pre-writing (clustering, 8 specifics, outlining, etc.)

F. Freewrite a position essay. Try to stay away from print materials and the web for now. In order to avoid plagiarism, you must try to set things up based on your own, original thoughts. If you have trouble coming up with things to say, look to define, classify, exemplify, compare, contrast, show effects, describe, and/or narrate a story on your topic. Push yourself to get everything out that you possibly can before you start to research.

G. Revise and edit your freewriting. Try to set it up in a sensible format. Remember to think of the needs of your audience.

H. When you’re satisfied with your tentative position paper set up, start to gather the books, magazines, news articles, web materials, etc. that you need to back up your opinions.

I. Take notes on pertinent materials, ones that support your arguments. Get several sources to support each major point (See the notes section below.).

        1. Computer Notes: If you know where the notes fit into your freewrite materials, scroll to the proper position in the freewrite text and add them. (Do not forget to document where needed and to write down the materials that you will need for your bibliography. (See documentation and bibliography below.)

        2.  If you do not see where the notes could fit into your freewrite text at the present time but still think that the material may be useful later, scroll down below your freewrite text, and just attach the information below for now. Use a specific topic label. Again, do not forget to document.

        3. Note Cards: Although it may seem old-fashioned, taking notes on cards is still the best bet. The reason is that the cards can be manipulated. If you take notes on cards that have specific topics at their head that correspond to the topics in your paper, the cards can easily be spread out for easy viewing. They can then be arranged in order to match your paper and transferred into your paper easily. Scrolling through notes taken on a computer can be awkward as you cannot have access to all of them at once.

J. As you build your research paper, think about how your materials are organized and how they connect. Prove what you say several ways before moving on to the next point. Never assume that the reader agrees and do not tell the reader what to believe. Develop sections of your argument with detail and documentation. Use the basic expository formats (definition, classification, exemplification, compare/contrast, cause/effect, process, description, narration) to build individual sections if you are having trouble developing your argument from your main points.

K. After writing and revising your sections, decide on the best order and move the sections to the position that make the most sense logically. Then work on creating transition sentences and paragraphs. Finally, strengthen the introduction and conclusion. Start with an attention-catcher. End by culminating with something insightful that the reader will take with him/her after leaving the paper.

L. Edit and run the paper through the spellchecker.

M. Write the bibliography (See below.).

N. IMPORTANT: MAKE SURE THAT YOUR PAPER BEGINS WITH YOUR OWN ORIGINAL IDEAS. ALSO, AS THE PAPER’S AUTHOR, YOU MUST INTERPRET THE MATERIALS THAT YOU READ, TRANSLATE THEM FOR YOUR AUDIENCE AND INCORPORATE THEM INTO YOUR OWN ORGANIZATIONAL PLAN. THE PAPER MUST NOT BE JUST A COLLECTION OF QUOTATIONS AND SUMMARIZED MATERIALS. YOUR FINAL PAPER MUST BE MOSTLY AN ORIGINAL DOCUMENT WITH OUTSIDE SOURCES CITED TO BACK-UP YOUR IDEAS. IT CANNOT BE MOSTLY A COLLECTION OF OUTSIDE SOURCES WITH A BIT OF YOUR IDEAS THROWN IN.


II. NOTETAKING

  Before taking notes on any source, do a complete scan of the material to familiarize yourself with what it says. If the material is difficult to understand, read through it slowly. Look up unknown vocabulary as needed. Remember that it is your job to make difficult materials easier for the reader. In any case, do not start taking notes until you thoroughly understand the material. Usually, as you read more of your subject, the material gets easier to interpret as you start to know more about it. Start with the simplest, most basic materials and save the tough ones for when you’re more knowledgeable. When you take notes, read the material one paragraph or two at a time. Stop. Make a decision as to what type of note is the most appropriate (See summary, paraphrase and direct quote below.). Take the note. Document it. Then move to the next section of the source.

THREE TYPES OF NOTES AND THEIR FUNCTIONS

A. The Direct Quote contains the exact words, emphasis, and punctuation of the writer or speaker whose information is being recorded. Quotes should be used sparingly because they interfere with the natural flow of your own style. Use them only when the thought or meaning of the source would suffer unless recorded exactly or when the source’s manner of expression is particularly noteworthy. Document all quotes.

Example: “Ask not what your country can do for you. Ask what you can do for your country” (Kennedy 36).

B. The Paraphrase is written when the purpose is to rephrase the information by replacing more familiar terminology for that contained in the source material. A paraphrase is approximately the same length as the original. Most of your notetaking is usually of the paraphrase type. Use it to clarify and to make cited text parallel to your own text. Paraphrasing must be documented after each sentence as there is no paraphrase mark that is similar to a quotation mark.

Example:

Original text from source: “Slang is of general dispersion though it stands outside the accepted canon.”

Paraphrase of above text: Slang is widespread but is not widely accepted (Meinken 42).

Notice how the original text is difficult to decipher. The paraphrased text fits much better with the text of the rest of the paper.

C. The Summary note is taken when it is necessary or valuable to reduce the information contained in a source to its barebones, basic points. Summaries of unopinionated material that can be found in more than one source do not need documentation.

Example:

Original source from text: John Smith bartered with the Native Americans on several occasions in 1648. He exchanged jewelry for tobacco and seeds. He also bargained with the white settlers.

Summary note: John Smith bartered with the Native Americans and with the white settlers.


III. PLAGIARISM

Plagiarism is the failure to document or misrepresentation of documentation. The reader must be aware of what materials are researched materials and where all researched materials came from at all times while the paper is being read. If a sentence is not followed by documentation, the reader assumes that the material in the sentence was created by the paper’s author or that it is legitimately summarized factual material. If the material is a quote, it must be surrounded by quotation marks and followed by documentation. Long quotes can be indented and documented. If the material is a paraphrase, each sentence of it must be followed by documentation.

 

WHAT MUST BE DOCUMENTED:

1. SPECIFIC OPINIONS OF OTHERS

2. SPECIFIC VOCABULARY OF OTHERS

3. SPECIFIC SYNTAX OF OTHERS

4. LISTS COMPILED BY OTHERS

5. STATISTICS


WHAT DOES NOT NEED DOCUMENTATION:

1. YOUR OWN ORIGINAL OPINIONS

2. GENERALLY HELD OPINIONS

3. YOUR OWN VOCABULARY

4. YOUR OWN SYNTAX

5. YOUR OWN LISTS

More than half of the sentences in a typical research paper are documented as paraphrase or quote. The quality of the paper is not based on how much or how few documented areas exist but on how accurate the documentation is. When in doubt – document!


IV. BIBLIOGRAPHY AND TEXT DOCUMENTATION

This guide summarizes the MLA guidelines for writing research papers and citations.  It is based on the MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers, 6th ed.  For more information and examples of citations, consult the MLA Handbook.


WORKS CITED

Place the list of works cited at the end of the paper.  Center the title, Works Cited, an inch from the top of the page.  Double-space between the title and the first entry.  Begin each entry flush with the left margin.  Indent subsequent lines one-half inch (five spaces).  Double space both within and between entries.

Alphabetize by the author's last name.  If the author is unknown, alphabetize by the title.

Examples:


A Book by a Single Author:

Dodge, L. Mara.  Thieves of the Worst Kind:  A Study of Women, Crime,
     and Prisons, 1835-2000.  DeKalb: Northern Illinois, 2002. 


A Book by Two or More Authors:
If the book has two or three authors, all authors are mentioned in the citation.  However, if the book was written by more than three authors, only the first author is mentioned, followed by et. al.

Block, Holly, et al.  Art Cuba: The New GenerationNew York: Abrams, 2001.

Salzman, Jack, David Lionel Smith, and Cornel West, eds. Encyclopedia of
     African-American Culture and History.  5 vols. New York: Macmillan, 1996. 


A Work (essay, short story, poem, article) in an Anthology (or collection):


Rodriguez de Tio, Lola.  "Ode to October 10."  The Anthology of Hispanic Literature of theUnited States.  Ed.
    Nicolas Kanellos. New YorkOxford UP, 2002.  560-563. 


An Article in a Reference Book:


        Signed (has an author):
Goodwin, Noel.  "Shostakovich, Dmitry." The New Grove Dictionary of Music and
     Musicians.  2nd ed.  2001.
         Unsigned (no author):
"Northern Right Whale."  Beacham's Guide to the Endangered Species of North America.
Ed. Walton Beacham,
       et al.  6 vols. Detroit: Gale, 2001. 


An Article in a Scholarly Journal:

    ... with Continuous Pagination:


Danner, Bruce.  "Speaking Daggers." Shakespeare Quarterly 54 (2003): 29-62.

    ...that Pages Each Issue Separately:
(In this instance, issue numbers must be included in the citation.  The issue number is placed after the volume number and is preceded by a period. )

Carter, Nancy Carol.  "The Special Case of Alaska:  Native Law and Research."
    Legal  Quarterly 22.4:  11-46. 


An Article in a Magazine:


(Magazines are published more frequently than scholarly journals.  Instead of identifying the magazine using the volume and issue number, you need only cite the magazine's date of publication.
)

Goodell, Jeff.  "The Plunder of Wyoming." Rolling Stone 21 Aug. 2003: 64-69.


An Article in a Newspaper:


Gladstone, Valerie.  "Shiva Meets Martha Graham, at a Very High Speed."  New YorkTimes
    10 Aug. 2003, New England ed., sec. 2: 3.

Graham, George.  "WestfieldState to Expand Parking."  Republican [Springfield]
    22 July 2003, Metro West ed.: B1.


Web Pages Basic Form:

Author of webpage/document (if available). "Title of Webpage or Document."
     "Title of Website.  Editor of site (if available).  Publication date or date updated (if available).
     Sponsoring Organization (if available).  Date of access <URL>

  • Author: Usually found at the top or bottom of the web page. If a name is not available, begin your citation with the document or web page title. 

  • Title of Web Page/Document: May be found at top left corner of printout, or at the top of the Web browser. 

  • Title of Website: Often listed as a homepage, the site for which the document was created. 

  • Update/Publication date: Usually found at the end of the document.  Give the full date (day, month, and year) 

  • Sponsoring Organization: If the web page is produced by an organization, a school, a company, etc., provide that information here. 

  • URL:  The Uniform Resource Locator is the Web address of your document.  It is found at the top right corner of your printout or in the location bar on your Web browser. 

Example:

Turco, Richard P. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions." UCLA Institute of the Environment
    UCLA. January 10, 2004 http://www.ioe.ucla.edu/publications/report01/GreenhouseGas.htm 


Government Publications:

United States.  Cong.  Joint Economic Committee.  Economic Effect of Vietnam
     Spending: Hearings.  90th Cong., 1st sess.  2 vols. Washington:  GPO, 1967. 


Infotrac:

Edmonson, Bradley. “AIDS and Aging.” American Demographics Mar. 1990: 28+
    The Aids Crisis. Ed. Eleanor Goldstein. Vol. 2. Boca Raton:  Infotrac, 2001.


Interview:

Pie, I. M. Personal interview. 22 July 1993. 


TV Show :

“Yes…but is It Art?” Narr. Morley Safer. Sixty Minutes. CBS WTIC, Hartford, 19
        Sept. 1997.


DOCUMENTATION IN TEXT
  You must cite your use of "another's words, facts, or ideas.”  "References in the text must clearly point to specific sources in the list of works cited."  Identify sources by author's last name, and include page numbers.  Online sources may not have fixed page numbers to cite. If "you include an author's name in a sentence, you need not repeat the name in the parenthetical page citation that follows..." 


Citing Part of a Work:

Dodge's analysis of occupations reveals that "virtually all female convicts were poor or working-class" (114). 

In this novel, Atwood draws on French feminist theory (Freibert 16). 

Watts and Bahill conclude that "outlawing aluminum bats would produce faster batted-ball speeds" (144). 

...in his painting of Fidel Castro greeting the Pope (Block, et al. 140).



Citing Volume and Page Numbers of a Multivolume Work:


"In the year 1824, some 13,000 black Americans emigrated to Haiti..." (Salzman, Smith, and West 3: 1348).



Citing a Work Listed by Title:


...a rule requiring avoidance measures within 500 yards of the whales ("Northern Right Whale" 105).



Citing Two or More Works by the Same Author or Authors:


...in an article about W.P.A. writers (Brinkley, "Unmasking" A15). 

"From 1897 to 1917, Storyville...became the world's most famous red-light district" (Brinkley, American Heritage 382).



V. RESEARCH PAPER FORMAT
 

Individual teachers and institutions or departments may vary from these recommendatons somewhat and it is always wise to consult with your teacher before formatting and submitting your work.

Paper:

Use white, 8 1/2- by 11-inch paper.

Margins:

Except for page numbers (see below), leave one-inch margins all around the text of your paper -- left side, right side, and top and bottom. Paragraphs should be indented half an inch; set-off quotations should be indented an inch from the left margin (five spaces and ten spaces, respectively, on standard computers).

Spacing:

The MLA Guide says that "the research paper must be double-spaced," including quotations, notes, and the list of works cited.

Heading and Title:

Your research paper does not need a title page. At the top of the first page, at the left-hand margin, type your name, your instructor's name, the course name and number, and the date -- all on separate, double-spaced lines. Then double-space again and center the title above your text. (If your title requires more than one line, double-space between the lines.) Double-space again before beginning your text. The title should be neither underlined nor written in all capital letters. Capitalize only the first, last, and principal words of the title. Titles might end with a question mark or an exclamation mark if that is appropriate, but not in a period. Titles written in other languages are capitalized and punctuated according to different rules, and writers should consult the MLA Guide or their teachers.

Example of beginning of a first page:

 

Aflack 1

Mary Ann Aflack

Mr. Calabrese

Interpreting English 12

14 October 2005

The Dust Specks

 “Who am I? I asked myself. But it was like trying to identify one particular cell that coursed through the torpid veins of my body. Maybe I was just this blackness and bewilderment and pain…” So says Ellison’s protagonist in Invisible Man. As humans, we are fraught with an …


Page Numbers:

Number your pages consecutively throughout the manuscript (including the first page) in the upper right-hand corner of each page, one-half inch from the top. Type your last name before the page number. Most word processing programs provide for a "running head," which you can set up as you create the format for the paper, at the same time you are establishing things like the one-inch margins and the double-spacing. This feature makes the appearance and consistency of the page numbering a great convenience. Make sure the page-number is always an inch from the right-hand edge of the paper (flush with the right-hand margin of your text) and that there is a double-space between the page number and the top line of text. Do not use the abbreviation p. or any other mark before the page number.

Tables and Figures:

Tables should be labeled "Table," given an arabic numeral, and captioned (with those words flush to the left-hand margin). Other material such as photographs, images, charts, and line-drawings should be labeled "Figure" and be properly numbered and captioned.

Binders:

Generally, the simpler the better. Teachers prefer nice, flat stacks of papers they can stuff into their briefcases and backpacks? A simple staple in the upper left-hand corner of your paper should suffice. Your teachers or their departments may have their own rules about binders, and you should consult with them about this matter.


The above MLA materials are from the following source:

Gibaldi, Joseph.  MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers.  6th ed. New York

Modern Language Association, 2003. 


VI.    SAMPLE TEXT WITH DOCUMENTATION:

Notice how the paper below combines significant points and literary analysis with text citing and research. The key is to integrate all of the pieces and provide the reader with a seamless package.



  The Dust Specks

         “Who am I? I asked myself. But it was like trying to identify one particular cell that coursed through the torpid veins of my body. Maybe I was just this blackness and bewilderment and pain” (Ellison 32). So says Ellison’s protagonist in Invisible Man. As humans, we are fraught with an intense, innate need for self-identify; our entire lives are spent trying to find out exactly who we are and what we are meant to do. Faced with this unquenchable drive, we turn in one of two directions, eliminating all that differentiates us from others or deliberately changing to distinguish ourselves as individual. Yet, neither of these paths provides us with the peace intrinsic in knowing our own identity. The only way to achieve such calm is to give up the struggle against what is around us and to act upon the instinctive sense of life that is within us, seeking harmony with the world rather than a means of distinguishing ourselves from our surroundings.
        The strongest need of mankind after physical needs are met is to love and be loved (Myers 85). We have an innate dread of being alone, which drives us to seek the companionship of others; we fear being seen as a distinct person for it exposes us to the criticism of others, makes us vulnerable. In Beckett’s Waiting for Godot, Estragon cries to Vladimir “Don’t touch me! 
Don’t question me! Don’t speak to me! Stay with me” (Beckett 41). Expressing his panic at being left by himself, he needs the physical presence of another person, but wants it unconditionally; rather than a ‘you and me’ he wants an ‘us’. Later, Pozzo admits, “Yes, gentlemen, I cannot go for long without the society of my likes” (Beckett 51). John Bowlby, who developed Attachment Theory in the mid-20th century, explains this with the idea that affectionate attachments to others are essential to the survival of mankind (Peluso 141). Yet such bonds can easily become too strong, and we lose the ability or the motivation to recognize ourselves as separate individuals…


VII. GUIDELINES FOR FINDING AND DEVELOPING A THESIS

  1. A thesis is an idea that you formulate and reformulate about your subject. It should offer a theory about the meaning of evidence that would not have been immediately obvious to your readers. 

  2. Look for a thesis by focusing on an area of your subject that is open to opposing viewpoints or multiple interpretations. Rather than attempting to locate a single right answer, search for something that raises questions. 

  3. The body of your paper should serve not only to substantiate the thesis by demonstrating its value in selecting and explaining evidence but also to bring the opening version of the thesis into better focus. 

  4. Evolve your thesis-move it forward-by seeing the questions that each new formulation of it prompts you to ask. 

  5. Develop the implications of your evidence and of your observations as fully as you can by repeatedly asking, "Why do I care?" 

  6. When you encounter potentially conflicting evidence (or interpretations of that evidence), don't simply abandon your thesis. Take advantage of the complications to expand, qualify, and refine your thesis until you arrive at the most accurate explanation of the evidence that you can manage. 

  7. Reason forward (scaffold) to conclusions by reasoning backward to premises. 

  8. Arrive at the final version of your thesis by returning to your initial formulation- the position you set out to explore-and restating it in the more carefully qualified way you have arrived at through the body of your paper. 

  9. To check that your thesis has evolved, locate and compare the various versions of it throughout the draft. Have you done more than demonstrate the general validity of an unqualified claim? 


VIII. GUIDELINES FOR FIXING WEAK THESIS STATEMENTS
  1. Your thesis should make a claim with which it would be possible for readers to disagree. Find some avenue of inquiry rather than defending statements your readers would accept as obviously true. 

  2. Be skeptical of your first (often semiautomatic) response to a subject. It will often be a cliché or too broad. Avoid conventional wisdom unless you can qualify it or introduce a fresh perspective on it. 

  3. Convert broad categories and generic (fits anything) claims to more specific assertions. Find ways to bring out the complexity of your subject. 

  4. Submit the wording of your thesis to this grammatical test: if it follows the "abstract noun + is + evaluative adjective" formula ("The economic situation is bad"), substitute a more specific noun and an active verb that will force you to predicate something about a focused subject ("Tax laws benefit the rich"). 

  5. Treat your thesis as a hypothesis to be tested rather than an obvious truth. Examine and question your own terms and categories rather than simply accepting them. 

  6. Always work to uncover and make explicit the unstated assumptions (premises) underlying your thesis. Don't treat debatable premises as givens. 

  7. As a rule, be suspicious of thesis statements that depend on words such as “real”, “accurate”, “believable”, “right”, and “good”. These words frequently signal that you are offering personal opinions-what "feels" right to you as self-evident truths for everybody. 


IX. GUIDELINES FOR INTRODUCTIONS AND CONCLUSIONS

  Introductions

  1. The introduction seeks to raise the issue, not settle it. 

  2. Engage your readers by expressing why, in terms of existing thinking on the subject, your topic matters. Avoid "catchy" introductory gimmicks in academic writing. 

  3. Always introduce a working hypothesis, frame it with background or other context, and indicate your method or angle of approach. Cite relevant sources. 

  4. Don't try to do too much. Offer only the most relevant context, the most essential parts of your road map, and a first rather than last claim. 

  5. Experiment with different opening types. Challenge a common view, use your second best example to set up the issue, or exemplify the problem with a narrative opening. 

Conclusions

  1. Don't just summarize; culminate. Offer your most qualified statement of the thesis or your final judgment on the question posed in the introduction. 

  2. Come full circle. Revisit the introductory hypothesis and context. This strategy will unify your paper. 

  3. Accept the limitations of your discussion or study. Don't assert more than your evidence has established. 

  4. Give your conclusion a send-off. Leave the reader with implications or speculations to think about further. Avoid closing the conclusion with a concession. 

  5. Let your conclusion gradually escort the reader out of the paper. Like the introduction, it is a social site, so leave the reader with a positive last impression. 


X. GUIDELINES FOR ANALYZING EVIDENCE

  1. Support your assertions with evidence. Locate the details that have led you to your conclusions. 

  2. Interpret the evidence for your readers, rather than leaving examples to speak for themselves. Make details speak. 

  3. Make explicit what is implicit in both your evidence and your claims. 

  4. State the connection between the evidence and the claims, rather than just putting the evidence next to the claims. Explain how each example supports, refines, or extends the point you are making. 

  5. Allow your evidence to shape your claim, rather than trying to force the evidence to fit a preconceived and overly broad generalization. 

  6. Give yourself the chance to discover a workable idea by narrowing your focus. Say more about less rather than less about more, allowing a carefully analyzed part of your subject to provide perspective on the whole. 

  7. It is generally better to make ten points on a representative issue or example than to make the same basic point about ten related issues or examples. 

  8. When writing about a number of examples, explore the significant differences among them, rather than just pointing to a general similarity. 

  9. Use your best example as a lens through which to examine other evidence. Your analysis of subsequent examples should test and develop the conclusions derived from your best example, rather than just confirming that you are right. 

  10. Argue overtly that the examples on which you focus are representative. Be careful not to generalize on the basis of too little or unrepresentative evidence. 

  11. To test the representativeness of your evidence and qualify your claims, seek out and address the single piece of evidence that most effectively opposes your point of view. 


XI. GUIDELINES FOR USING SOURCES

  1. Avoid the temptation to plug in sources as "answers." Aim for a conversation with them. Think of sources as voices inviting you into a community of interpretation, discussion, and debate. 

  2. Quote, paraphrase, or summarize in order to analyze. Explain what you take the source to mean, showing the reasoning that has led to the conclusion you draw from it. 

  3. Quote, rather than summarize or paraphrase, when the actual language is important to your point. Then analyze the important terms directly, bringing out their implications. 

  4. Quote sparingly. You are usually better off centering your analysis on a few quotations and branching out to aspects of your subject that the quotations illuminate. 

  5. Put your source in a context that will give your readers perspective on its concerns. Which of its points does the source find most important? What positions does it want to modify or refute, and why? 

  6. Attribute sources ("According to Einstein, . . .) in the text of your paper, not just in parenthetical citations. Such attributions (a) help your readers evaluate the source material as they read it and (b) distinguish source material from your remarks about it. 

  7. Look for ways to develop, modify, or apply what a source has said, rather than simply agreeing or disagreeing with it. Ask yourself, "If we accept this position as true, then what follows?" 

  8. If you challenge a position found in a source, be sure to represent it fairly. First give the source some credit by identifying assumptions you share with it. Then isolate the part that you intend to complicate or dispute. 

  9. Look for sources that address your subject from different perspectives. Avoid relying too heavily on any one source. 

  10. When your sources disagree, consider playing mediator. Instead of immediately agreeing with one or the other, clarify areas of agreement and disagreement among them. 


Sections VII-XI above from:

* Rosenwasser, David. Writing Analytically. Philadelphia: Harcourt Brace College

            Publishers, 1997.