Minutes of February 7, 2006

 

Present were: Donald Anderson, Chairman; Louis Calabrese, Vice Chairman, Marilyn Richards and Thomas Morrissette.  Michael Przybylowicz, Clerk was not present at the meeting.

 

Center Square Project and sign approval informal Meeting with  Edward Pesce and Jayson Falcone

 

Donald Anderson welcomed Mr. Pesce, Jayson Falcone, James Falcone and Frank Fitzgerald to the meeting.  At this time, Mr. Pesce provided the Board with a memorandum outlining what the group wanted to discuss with the Board.  Mr. Anderson stated that it would be best to start at the top of the list and go through every item one at a time.

 

He then read that the applicant is looking to relocate the fire hydrant at the North Main Street entrance.  Ed Pesce said he had an revised site plan but it does not show the fire hydrant location which is on a utility plan.  Mr. Pesce stated that he would be providing a new plan showing any changes.   Mr. Anderson stated that the plans the Board had endorsed were from September 6, 2005 and that was the plan of record and any changes would have to be presented to the Board for their consideration and endorsement.

 

Mr. Pesce stated that they were looking for suggestions and feed back on the new plan and explained that the fire hydrant was moved at the request of the fire department, it has been done and he explained how the change was made.  Mr. Anderson asked if when requests come in from DPW and Fire is the Planning Board informed about the changes?  He added if not, it is required that the Planning Board be the first point of authority and that they need to have the most accurate plans in the office because that is what the Board signed off on.  Mr. Anderson suggested they could communicate with other departments, as long as Robyn was informed first and that she have any changes (proposed or otherwise) on file so that the Board knows something is being done to their pre-approved plan. 

 

Mr. Pesce said he felt that it was a responsible request.  He said the next item was a suggestion from the contractor for the sidewalk relocation at Crane Avenue.  He further explained that the approved plan shows a grass strip, sidewalk and a 12 foot vegetated grass strip along the street line, as required by the zoning by-laws.  Mr. Pesce continued by stating that the contractor suggested they move the sidewalk over past the curb and combine the grass strip on the other side of the sidewalk.  He then showed the Board a proposed plan showing this change.

 

The Members said that they did not see this to be an issue.   Mr. Pesce said the next item was the parking direction change in front of Rocky’s.  He also stated that they had flipped the angle of the parking at building B/E, and in doing so they lost one parking space.  He continued by stating that they decided to eliminate the fenced-in propane area and put it below ground permanently.  Ms. Richards asked if the Board had a report from the Police Department and Ms. Macdonald explained that Sergeant Bates needs to see a finished plan before preparing a report.  Mr. Pesce said next was the pylon sign redesign for the Center Village itself and they actually have a new application that they submitted to the Building Inspector the previous day. 

 

Mr. (Jayson) Falcone said the sign would be off white and have incorporated the script they talked about as far as East Longmeadow Center village goes, the identification along the bottom of the sign base with regard to the library, and identifying Town Hall.  He said the sign itself is constructed of aluminum with an epoxy finish over it and is internally lit and each of the sign panels are lit from behind.  Ms. Richards asked if the whole structure is lit up?  Mr. Falcone said no, each of the blocks and the East Longmeadow Center Village portion would be lit.  

 

Mr. Anderson asked if he had a sample of the type of material that would be used for this sign?   Mr. Falcone said he could obtain photographs of the signs that are constructed of the same material and bring them to the Board for review.   Mr. Anderson said all he was seeing was pvc and aluminum and just wanted to make sure the final product is creating the image that it is projecting.  Mr. Falcone said they are looking for something that is sharp looking and not obnoxiously lit, something that fits into the character of the town, but would try and get a piece of the panel so that the Board could see it.  

 

Mr. Anderson asked if the artist rendering was trying to match the Rocky’s color to the Town of East Longmeadow building or is the Town of East Longmeadow building was going to be the similar color.  Mr. (James) Falcone said it is more of red brick color then a fire engine red.  Mr. Pesce asked if they were heading in the right direction?  Mr. Anderson said yes, as long as the Board is provided with samples for review. 

 

Mr. Morrissette asked if the sign would represent office tenants or just retail tenants.  Mr. Falcone said it would depend on each tenant and as they move forward leasing.  Ms. Richards said that the Board has not been approving any signs with LED illumination.  Mr. Falcone said when they say LED they mean back lighting not LED as in light bulbs, Mr. (James) Falcone added it is what illuminates the plastic.  Ms. Richards said the votes are all now no LED illumination and she does not know how they would approve any such lighting.  Mr. Falcone said that there are two different types of LED illumination, there is LED such as a reader board and then LED could be used to back light signs.   Mr. Anderson said the sign person should come in and demonstrate it to the Board before they approve anything.  Mr. Morrissette said there is to be no exterior LED lighting. 

 

Mr. Pesce said the next item is the parking space changes and  the brick walkways.  He said that the type of brick they plan to use for the sidewalk is called Yankee Cobble and the color is called Beacon Hill Blend and passed the sample around and asked for the Board’s consent so they could go ahead and order it.  Ms. Richards asked what was going to be done about the concrete that was poured on Maple Street?   Mr. Pesce  said that the contractor has said there are no plans to do anything with it at this time.  Mr. (James) Falcone said that was something that they were addressing and were looking  at products with DPW in terms of what makes sense.  Ms. Richards said it was the Board’s understanding that it would be incorporated with the pavers at the time they were being installed.  Mr. (James) Falcone said they have committed to do that before the project is complete and it will be addressed. Mr. Morrissette asked if they could say ok to any type of sidewalk or does DPW have to ok it first.   Mr. Pesce said what they are putting in is what was previously approved by the Board.

 

Robyn Macdonald as if she could interrupt so they could address the request for waiver of site plan for US Academy of Martial Arts.

 

Waiver of Site Plan Review – US Academy of Marital Arts, 576 North Main Street

 

Mr. Morrissette read a letter into the record from Attorney Alfred Geoffrion on behalf of Deborah and Kuen Soo Han requesting a Waiver of Site Plan Review to relocate their martial arts school to property at 576 North Main Street.  Mr. Geoffrion said there would be no demolition or additions at this time, only interior modifications and some exterior work to make the exterior more presentable.  He added that any exterior signage would require review at a later time.  The Hans were asking the Planning Board to waive the site plan & design review and informed the members that a parking plan will be provided in the near future.  After discussion and upon motion duly made and seconded, the members unanimously (5-0) voted to GRANT the request for Waiver of Site Plan Approval to operate a martial arts school at an existing location at 576 North Main Street.  The Board would review the parking plan at their next meeting.

 

Center Square Project – discussion continued

 

At that time the Board continued discussions with  Mr. Pesce  and Mr. Falcone regarding Center Square Project.   Mr. Pesce  said he wanted to discuss parking spaces and the tenants (Starbucks and Spoleto’s) who are interested in the project.  He said the tenants have requested to make a couple of changes to architectural look of the outside of the building that are very minor.  He said as a result of doing that and recalculating parking they came up with a required number of parking spaces of 629 and by redesigning some of the space and looking at the way they would be using the loading dock, they were able to add parking spaces and resulted in a net change that 2 more parking spaces needed to be added on the rail trail.  He said that  57 parking spaces are constructed, and back in October, when they were told by Town Counsel that 5 spaces had to be relocated from the library area or the  town would not release the money they were holding.  He said because drainage was going in and the pavement was being put down, they added those parking spaces, however a light pole needed to be added.  

 

Mr. Pesce said there are minor changes to the parking spaces - there is a compactor pad and loading area pad that will never be used.  Further, that after talking with the tenants they said they would never use them either.  Mr. Pesce continued by stating that 2 dumpsters that will be supplied would be adequate for the intended uses and if they need to add another dumpster there is room.   Mr. Pesce  said with a 140 seat restaurant (Spoleto’s) and an 18 seat restaurant (Starbucks) the parking calculations work out exactly to what they have - a couple of parking spaces could be added, but if they do not have to it would be good.  Mr. Pesce continued by showing the Board architectural changes Spoleto’s has asked for, and stated that he developer thinks they are reasonable.  Specifically, they have asked to go from 2 doors to a single door and wanted a brick instead of glass in front of their kitchen.  He said on the side facing the Town Hall the glass is the same but they moved the locations of the banding of brick around and a single door over the entrance.  Mr. (Jayson) Falcone said that the column lines were the same and it is not 2 store fronts it is only one tenant occupying the entire space.  Mr. Pesce  said on the side facing Crane Avenue there is another entrance to Spoleto’s and said it is very close to the original approved plan. 

 

Ms. Richards asked if they could talk about the target date.   Mr. Pesce said the target date for full occupancy of the building is the 1st of July.   Mr. Anderson asked when the tenants would be in for site plan approval or waivers.  Mr. Falcone said in the next few months.   Mr. Pesce asked if they all need site plan waivers and Mr. Anderson said every one of them. 

 

Ms. Richards reminded the developer that a restaurant use requires a Special Permit.  She said, going back to the parking, she is disappointed that there are as many parking spaces as they have in the rail trail, that is off-site parking and she is concerned that the Town Hall is going to lose because they are going to be concentrating all of the big attractions in one location.  Ms. Richards said the parking being added to allow concentration on those uses at the central location are on the rail trail and when the library spaces were discussed, the Board said no more parking spaces on the rail trail. 

 

Ms. Richards continued by stating that the Board needs to know the actual square footage of Starbuck’s and also Spoleto’s and asked about the basement that was added.   Mr. Pesce said they asked for a basement for cold storage and refrigeration,  that they have designed two ways to exit and a bathroom may be added for employees to wash their hands.  Mr. Morrissette said with another level for storage that would enable them to fit more seats in the restaurant and stated that the parking ratios would be off.  Mr. (James) Falcone said as a retailer in the area he has stores with 1,500 square foot basements, they have stores with mezzanines and stores with no basements or mezzanines.  He said there is need for a storage area on the 1st floor and having extra storage just give buying power, in some case it is efficient and some cases it is not  - it depends on how some people run their business.  Mr. (James) Falcone added that some people feel the fastest way to get product in and out of the door without having to store it and handle it is an effective way to do business or a matter of necessity.   He said someone is not required to have a certain number of square feet - however 15 to 20 % of the back room space is needed for storage even if there is a full basement, so what Ms. Richards is saying is not true. 

 

Ms. Richards responded by stating that the parking formula has very specific uses identified in the by-laws and other uses such as Healthtrax (or a similar business) are not specific in the by-laws.  She said the Board looked at the office space with respect to the physician space and came up with some kind of formula that was fair with that particular use.  She said they do not section out bathrooms or hallways.  She continued by stating that now there is a use that is driven by a restaurant use (by seats), and now there is a large area, that is a surprise to the Board (that a basement was going in).  Mr. (James) Falcone said they did not know it was an issue and did not know they were required to tell the Board.  Ms. Richards said the project is under a Special Permit.

 

Mr. Pesce said they never told the Board Spoleto’s was going in until that evening and word has been transmitted throughout the town, and the Town Hall has construction plans showing a basement so they were not hiding it.  Mr. (James) Falcone said as far the building goes, being in the state of Massachusetts, basement space is not calculated as part of the square footage of the dwelling.  Ms. Richards said it is a concern to the Board if the use evolves down into the basement. 

 

Dan Hellyer, the Building Inspector, said it was a storage area and it was no different - according to all of the codes if it is 6 feet above the ground it is considered a floor and this is no different then if they put a slab down - they are only going to have so many people and because they have a basement they are required to install sprinklers but they do not get additional people allowed in the building.  So if they have an occupant load of 140 seats in that building and they have a big basement downstairs they can only have 140 seats in that building whether they have a slab or full basement.

 

Mr. Morrissette asked where the 140 seat number comes from.  Mr. (James) Falcone said it is based on the number of seats.   Mr. Anderson asked if the number of seats increases because of the cellar.  Mr. Falcone said no that the cellar has nothing to do with the occupancy.   Mr. Anderson asked again if there was no basement or mezzanine you would still have 140 seats?  Mr. Falcone said yes.  Mr. (James) Falcone said that they were furnishing the parking according to the number of seats and not per square foot, so the square foot calculation is not considered. 

 

Mr. (James) Falcone said the operator would have to make a business decision in terms of bringing product in and getting product out and what makes the most sense for their business but it has absolutely no impact on the occupancy of the building or the number of seats.   Mr. Morrissette asked how do they know that some of the prep area for the salads aren’t going to be done downstairs and brought up by a dumb waiter.   Mr. Calabrese said when the Board does the site plan for the restaurant they could look back to what was done for Fusion.  He added that Fusion brought a floor plan that showed the amount of seating that they are going to have and that is what they are going to have to do for this project.   Mr. Calabrese also stated that the Building Inspector is telling the Board they can only use the downstairs for storage because it is a restaurant and they are dealing with seating as opposed to square footage.  

 

Ms. Richards asked if the 4,700 square feet is the floor space upstairs not including the basement?   Mr. Pesce said correct.  Ms. Richards said the Board needs to factor what parking was applied to the square footage, minus that and then add the parking required for 140 seats.

 

Mr. (James) Falcone said basically they took the space that the tenants were using, took 5 cars per thousand and put that back into the count and then they counted seats at 1 space for 3 seats and added that to the count, so that is the adjustment came up with the need for more spaces.

 

Mr. Morrissette asked what will happen with the additional traffic trips?  Mr. (Jayson) Falcone said that they were well under the 750 per day for high traffic uses.   Mr. Pesce said he brought the trip generation drafts and, for the record, there are two ways to calculate trip generation: one is by square footage and one is by seats.  He added that  he looked at both ways and neither of them are more than 400 trips a day. 

 

Ms. Richards said that is for Spoleto’s what about Starbucks.   Mr. Pesce said that Starbuck’s was even smaller so neither use is over the 700 trips a day and it is actually less because Starbucks doesn’t get the same number of patrons.  

 

Mr. Anderson said he thought all that got approved was the foundation to be poured because of the weather, but once building permits get taken out and the Board does not know it gets down to the Board approving a plan that is not correct.  He said the plan has to be correct and as long it is a work in progress the Board still needs to have a copy of the building permit or copy of the plan just to constantly have for the file. 

 

Mr. (Jayson) Falcone said to clarify Mr. Anderson’s comment, the footprint of the building has not changed and the plan has not changed.  Mr. Morrissette said what the Board approved was to be a slab building and when part of the slab is cut out and 5,000 square feet of basement is put in that is a change to the plan.  He said the basement was never shown on the plan so a permit or building permit should have never been issued without the Board having the opportunity to discuss it and approve or disapprove a new plan.

   

Ms. Richards said the Board has been doing research on the internet and looking at what is available in Northampton and she needs to feel comfortable that it is being proposed as a sit down dinner place with no curb service.  Mr. (Jayson) Falcone said they are looking at a full service restaurant, lunch will be a lighter fare with sit down or take out.  Ms. Richards said but with no curb service, right?   Mr. (Jayson) Falcone said that is right.  Mr. Morrissette said that parking will be mess during lunch time from 11:30 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. because Starbucks and Spoleto’s will have overlapping times and they still do not know what is going in the other stores.

 

Mr. Morrissette asked if they knew who else was interested in moving in other than Super Cuts and would they be they have appointments only or walk-ins?   Mr. Anderson said he thought that it was walk-in business based on their commercials he saw.  Mr. (Jayson) Falcone said that a cell phone business was also interested and they were still actively marketing the other spaces.  

 

Mr. Pesce said that Spoleto’s’ also asked them to come up with a new landscaping scheme and that they will bring those changes requested to the Board as soon they are ready. 

 

Ms. Richards said she was struggling with the fact that she had numerous conversations with Mr. (James) Falcone before the project even became a reality in terms of proposals before the Board and the discussions which were one on one and were not taped or recorded and that she was really concerned with the over-utilization of the site and the impact on traffic.  She remembers Mr. (James) Falcone telling her that the particular site could not handle a restaurant and that the most it could take was a Starbucks.  Ms. Richards continued by stating that they talked about that and now there is a Starbucks and a restaurant and parking spaces are being carved out in every little corner – dumpsters are being moved that might be put back on parking spaces if they realize they really are needed. 

 

Ms. Richards said the only thing she would add to the discussion was that the rail trail was not in the picture in terms of taking advantage of some off site parking.  Jim said a restaurant integrated into a site like this one  is a whole different animal than a free standing restaurant.  Mr. Pesce said the only comfort that he could add to the Boards consideration is that there is of common use area in both buildings that will never be retail.  He said it’s arguable what the demand for the two restaurants is going to turn into during the day because the peak and the evening for Spoleto’s were different and obviously more spaces would be needed during the peak hours when the other building usage would be a lot less.  

 

Mr. Pesce also said there was one thing that was not included on the list which is an asphalt walkway across the island to accommodate the traffic.   Mr. Anderson said the Board recognizes that there are some deficiencies in the parking bylaw that has to be addressed, the Board can’t cast a blind eye to that. 

 

Mr. (James) Falcone said one thing he would like to address is the other end of the spectrum, there maybe one of the businesses that has a little more traffic then thought but the Walgreen’s site is 15,000  square feet and is required to have 75 parking spaces, first of all it is 15,000 square feet but only 10,000 square feet is retail, 10,000 out of 15,000 he asked if they ever seen 75 or even 25 cars there.   Mr. Anderson said the purpose of project is to create a center area with a good cross walk – that people might visit Romito’s or walk over and visit everybody and have a true walking area for East Longmeadow. 

 

Mr. (James) Falcone said the fact that is a village concept it lends itself to foot traffic and the one thing they do not want to have is vacant stores and you cannot have a successful shopping center that costs 1 ½  times more than strip center to build, charging 1½ times more rent  than a strip center charges and hope that it is not going to do business.  He said that they were all in this together and it is going to be a spectacular place.   

 

Mr. Anderson said what he also needs to understand is being on the Planning Board and a citizen of the town, this is a business and we have to make sure it stays in business and the town people will not be discouraged because of parking becoming a problem.  He said that the Planning Board is trying to make both elements work.  Mr. (James) Falcone said he agreed with  Mr. Anderson and parking is extremely important and they think it is project that everyone would be proud of. 

 

Ms. Richards said they do not disagree and  Mr. Anderson said he was not against the tenants they were choosing.   Mr. Pesce said he felt there was not going to be any problems having parking spaces available at 7:00 p.m. and said look at the parking currently there are no issues. 

 

Mr. Morrissette said he thought you can see a traffic problem with just the buildings that are up and he thinks down the road there is going to be a larger issue.   Mr. Pesce said that they are faced with a real world problem, part of retailing Spoleto’s wanted to be in that corner. 

 

Mr. Calabrese asked if the twp parking spaces they are short could be accounted for in the rail trail.  Mr. (James) Falcone said they also have not taken that into consideration.  He added that, in the past, the Town has traditionally allowed a 20% recount for bathrooms or storage areas and for the library storage space was 1 space per 3,000 square feet.  Ms. Richards said that was because they did not have a formula for libraries.  Mr. (James) Falcone said it has been traditional when people apply for a regular permit and counted six spaces per thousand were allowed 20% reduction in space for backroom areas.  Ms. Richards said not since she has been on the Board.  Mr. Falcone asked if check and if two cars make the difference they could build a few hundred square feet less of building.  He also stated that they do respect their other neighbors and won’t put a grinder shop in because of Romito’s.

 

Mr. Falcone said that they are trying to have a good tenant mix and would be really neat to be able to come to the town center and have a choice of a couple restaurants and these stores will be something that the town does not have and it is not a duplication.   Mr. Anderson asked if Starbucks was a franchise.  Mr. (James) Falcone said that all Starbucks are owned by Starbucks.   Mr. Pesce thanked the board for their time and left a couple of copies of the site plan and said he will send the architectural color rendering.                 

Ms. Richards asked  Mr. Pesce if he calculated into the location the setback requirements regarding the placement of the signage.  Mr. (Jayson) Falcone said that the set back requirements for a ground sign was 12 feet.  Ms. Richards said the project talks about setback for signage the same as the primary building in that location which would be unrealistic for that particular project because it would be 50 feet from the curb.  She said her point is that the sign is rather substantial and she is looking in terms of visibility for people exiting the site making sure their visibility is not impaired by the sign. 

 

Mr. (Jayson) Falcone said 12 feet seems to be the number that he recalled from the bylaw, Ms. Richards said she knows that there is landscape buffer required also.   Mr. Pesce said that the stop line is ahead of the sign and the other sign is ahead of the line but if it need to be adjusted it could.  Mr. (Jayson) Falcone said it would not be an obstruction of visibility.        

 

Mr. Pesce said that Robyn Macdonald has advised them that need to formally request approval for all of the changes on the next agenda.  Ms. Macdonald said that the Board needs to make a determination whether or not the changes are substantial enough to warrant an amendment and if that is the case, that is a public hearing.  Mr. Morrissette said they cannot do anything without the Fire Department giving them something on the fire hydrant and is DPW going to sign off on the relocation of the sidewalk.  Ms. Macdonald said she has not spoken with anyone regarding changes proposed or made.  Mr. Falcone added that he could ask his sign designer to meet with the Board informally if they would like.  Mr. Morrissette said especially in regards to the LED’s.

 

Waiver of Site Plan Review – Bruce Miller, 174 North Main Street

 

Mr. Morrissette read a letter into the record from Bruce Miller requesting a Waiver of Site Plan Review to open a Rare Coin Business at 174 North Main Street.  The business will consist of buying and selling rare coins, jewelry and small antiques, hours of operations will be 9:00 am – 6:00 pm, closed on Sundays, all holidays except for the Christmas Season.  After review and discussion the Board would ask Mr. Miller to attend their next meeting to discus the safety and appearance of the store and also have him bring a color rendering of the sign he would like to place at the business.

 

Great Woods X

 

The Board endorsed the subdivisions plans and the construction contract for Great Woods X.

 

ANR – Great Woods Phase VIII, Lot 6

 

The Board reviewed the ANR for Great Woods VIII, Lot 6. Mr. Morrissette asked if there was proper square footage and there was.  After discussion and upon motion duly made and seconded, the Board voted unanimously (5-0) to approve the ANR.

 

 

There being no further business and upon motion duly made and seconded, the Board voted unanimously to close the public meeting at 10:30 p.m.

 

                                                                        For the Board,

 

 

 

                                                                        Thomas J. Morrissette, Acting Clerk