
Minutes
Board of Selectmen Meeting
Tuesday, March 15, 2005
*Note: The Board of Selectmen (BoS) convened at the High School so it could attend the lecture given by Ms. Maria Trozzi in the High School Auditorium.
PRESENT:
G. DeLisle, Chairman of the BoS, called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
APPOINTMENTS:
6:00 p.m. Acting Chief Niznik.
Acting chief Niznik held a discussion of his memo on protective vests; he is looking for 45-50% reimbursement, but it’s “a ways away”; he has a product in mind that he likes but he will leave it for incoming Chief Mellis to make the decision. Acting Chief Niznik continues to look for funding sources for this and other needs.
Discussion of 3/30/05: This is the date of the swearing-in ceremony for Chief Mellis. N. Breault to send out invitations to guests provided by Chief Mellis. J. Claffey discussed preliminary agenda for the ceremony; wording of invitations to officials; and keep the speaking program brief since it’s in the evening hours. J. Claffey suggested that Hampden County District Attorney William Bennett be invited as the guest speaker and the BoS agreed with the suggestion (without taking a vote.)
There was further general
discussion about the particulars of the ceremony e.g. speaking order, oath,
securing of facility, press releases, refreshments,
At this time, a motion was made by J. Claffey and seconded by G. DeLisle to enter into Executive Session with Acting Chief Niznik. A Roll Call vote was taken with Selectmen voting unanimously in favor to enter into Executive Session to discuss personnel issues, contract issues and potential litigation. The BoS voted to reconvene the meeting to open session upon completion of the Executive Session.
6:30 p.m. The meeting reconvened in open session.
OLD BUSINESS
The BoS approved unanimously.
(BoS 03/15/05)
2. Approval
of DPW recommendation: Site Plan, Raker
Realty LLC—2A
The BoS approved unanimously.
NEW BUSINESS
The BoS voted unanimously not to hire Kelly & Ryan.
The BoS voted unanimously to approve the waiver of license fees.
The BoS approved the request, pending notification of date and time.
The BoS approved the request.
(BoS 03/15/05)
BOARD OF HEALTH (BoH)
1. Employee Flu Clinic 2005: N. Breault to contact Dr. Lemanski for assistance. N. Breault gave an update on how the school nurse is helping to coordinate the program so that the employee program is separate from the Council on Aging program.
2. The BoH noted the email sent from S. McColgan, Tobacco Compliance Coordinator.
3. BoH computer class offerings: J. Claffey said to offer them to L. Banspach as Clerk of the BoH.
4. The BoH noted correspondence and invoice from the Tobacco Control Grants Administrator. The BoH approved the suggested press release.
REMINDERS/MEETINGS/INVITATIONS
6:55 p.m. The BoS closed the meeting at this time with a motion from J. Driscoll and seconded by J. Claffey; approved unanimously; to attend the lecture by Ms. Triozzi. The BoS voted to reconvene at 8:00 p.m., or the completion of Ms. Trozzi’s presentation.
8:30 p.m. The BoS reconvened the Meeting.
APPOINTMENTS,
Continued:
8:30 p.m. Martylee Caramante, Dog Control Officer/Animal Inspector for the Town.
M. Caramante and her invited guest Veronica
Johns from the Special Committee on Vicious Dogs in the City of
M. Caramante explained to the BoH that she encounters many situations where dogs are left tied to a “fixed point tether” for extended periods of time. She referred specifically, for example, to
(BoS 03/15/05)
an animal tied up at
that when she confronted the owners about keeping the dog tied constantly in all kinds of weather the owners apparently responded by shortening the length of chain the dog is tied to; how there is a
history at this address of at least one other dog in similar circumstances with the same owners at this location that was euthanized in the recent past. She said that she and others have concerns that this particular dog could break free and because of having been constantly tethered exhibit aggressive behavior to schoolchildren or the public at large.
M. Caramante stated that keeping a dog tethered to a fixed point for extended periods of time leads to aggressive, anti-social behavior in the animal. She cited some of the articles and nationwide examples of animal attacks that she provided to the BoH for its consideration where extended tethering and other acts of animal mistreatment and negligence are believed to have contributed to vicious behavior. She cited a growing trend of communities adopting tethering restrictions on dogs to reduce these behaviors with the goals of fostering better treatment of animals and improving public safety.
M. Caramante proposes the Town adopt By-laws to regulate the treatment of dogs, especially regarding “fixed point” restraint; allowing for perhaps a “trolley type of restraint”, or runner; that amount of time tied to and length of tether be regulated; that consideration of fixed point restraint be eliminated altogether.
M. Caramante proposed considering expanding the authority of the Dog Officer/Animal Inspector to be able remove from danger dogs that appear neglected. She showed the BoH a picture of a Shepard puppy in Town that was roped in a mud puddle, unable to get out of the puddle in the rain barking all day but she did not have authority to take the dog from the property. She called the MSPCA in that situation but they were unable to respond because they were very busy. She told the BoH that when she returned that evening with a police officer the dog was inside. She thinks there ought to be more specific laws that will give the Dog Officer the right to impound dog if it’s left out in cold or inclement weather for extended periods, or if its barking all night, etc.
V. Johns said she came to offer
support and experience as she has encountered many of these issues while
serving on the Vicious Dog Committee in
The BoH thanked M. Caramante and V. Johns for bringing these matters to its attention. There was general commentary about keeping animals and, in turn the public, safe. The BoH said it will review the materials and consider the proposals for By-laws with Town Counsel (TC).
8:46: James Sheils, Town Moderator (TM) and James Donahue, Town Counsel (TC.)
J. Sheils and J. Donahue met with the BoS to discuss matters pertaining to how Articles can be presented on the Floor during Town Meeting. Specifically, the BoS wanted to know if a single Article can be presented in such a manner that if the “First Version” of the Article is voted down can a second version—without certain provisions of the First Version—can be presented. The question stems form the Long Range Planning Committee’s desire to present a combined Article with a
(BoS 03/15/05)
solution for a Community Center, School Classroom Space,
Town Hall expansion, or other
J. Donahue said that he thinks that if an original motion were defeated then you could have a motion to separate the two requests and he thinks it could be done, but it’s more dependent on how the Town deals with the original Article. He asked what happens if, for example, if G. DeLisle votes for a motion and it gets defeated could he put it up for a motion again? J. Sheils said there is no clear reference in Roberts Rules so G. DeLisle could present it again.
G. DeLisle said he believe the
School and Senior Center Study Committees are going to pull their separate Articles;
but speaking with Town Accountant
J. Sheils said he attended a Town Moderator
seminar last year and he learned how one town has local cable access tape and
used it to create explanatory presentation of the Articles on a Warrant; not to
push votes one way or another, but to allow for it to be played for the public
prior to the meeting; there are several things he’d like to educate the Town on
certain procedures to make the process (of Town Meeting) more user-friendly;
he’d like to use
The BoS encouraged J. Sheils to contact
The meeting adjourned from Executive Session at 9:17 p.m., as noted in Town Counsel and recorded in Executive Session Minutes.
APPROVED: BOARD OF SELECTMEN MEETING, THURSDAY, MAY 26, 2005.